Skip to main content
    All AI News
    The Verge AIThursday, September 10, 2026 3 min read
    AI

    AI power users claim Anthropic duped them with subscriptions, and they’re taking it to court

    A class action lawsuit filed September 8, 2026 alleges Anthropic deceptively marketed its Claude Max subscription plans, priced at $100/month for 5x usage limits and $200/month for 20x limits above the $20/month Pro tier. Plaintiffs argu…

    Key takeaways
    • 01Plaintiffs argue the advertised multipliers are misleading because they apply only to five-hour usage sessions subject to weekly caps, not as broadly as marketing graphics implied.
    • 02Understanding the actual terms required navigating two separate hyperlinks and cross-referencing multiple pages to define key terms like "session." The suit was brought by two former FTC attorneys who worked under Lina Khan, representing a rare legal challenge to AI companies over subscription pricing practices.
    • 03The case reflects broader industry frustration over AI monetization and usage restrictions that diverge from advertised promises.
    In brief · from theverge.com

    A class action lawsuit filed September 8, 2026 alleges Anthropic deceptively marketed its Claude Max subscription plans, priced at $100/month for 5x usage limits and $200/month for 20x limits above the $20/month Pro tier. Plaintiffs argue the advertised multipliers are misleading because they apply only to five-hour usage sessions subject to weekly caps, not as broadly as marketing graphics implied. Understanding the actual terms required navigating two separate hyperlinks and cross-referencing multiple pages to define key terms like "session."

    Read the full article at theverge.com

    A class action lawsuit filed September 8, 2026 alleges Anthropic deceptively marketed its Claude Max subscription plans, priced at $100/month for 5x usage limits and $200/month for 20x limits above the $20/month Pro tier. Plaintiffs argue the advertised multipliers are misleading because they apply only to five-hour usage sessions subject to weekly caps, not as broadly as marketing graphics implied. Understanding the actual terms required navigating two separate hyperlinks and cross-referencing multiple pages to define key terms like "session." The suit was brought by two former FTC attorneys who worked under Lina Khan, representing a rare legal challenge to AI companies over subscription pricing practices. The case reflects broader industry frustration over AI monetization and usage restrictions that diverge from advertised promises.

    Don't miss tomorrow's

    The Daily Pulse in your inbox each morning — sourced and linked.

    How often
    Keep going — across the app