No data centers in my backyard
Data center development has become one of the most bipartisan flashpoints in American politics, with polls showing roughly 70% of both Democrats and Republicans opposed. A 10-day reporting trip across Wisconsin and Michigan found local o…
- 01In Janesville, Wisconsin, a proposed data center on a contaminated 250-acre former GM site drew fierce community resistance despite the developer offering $30 million in cleanup costs and $4.8 million in annual tax revenue.
- 02Activists successfully blocked the deal and secured a ballot referendum requiring voter approval for future developments exceeding $450 million.
- 03The backlash reflects a broader tension between the physical infrastructure demands of AI scaling and the communities expected to host it.
Data center development has become one of the most bipartisan flashpoints in American politics, with polls showing roughly 70% of both Democrats and Republicans opposed. A 10-day reporting trip across Wisconsin and Michigan found local opposition driven by a mix of concerns: energy costs, land use, water quality, and attachment to place, rather than abstract fears about AI. In Janesville, Wisconsin, a proposed data center on a contaminated 250-acre former GM site drew fierce community resistance despite the developer offering $30 million in cleanup costs and $4.8 million in annual tax revenue.
Read the full article at jasmi.newsData center development has become one of the most bipartisan flashpoints in American politics, with polls showing roughly 70% of both Democrats and Republicans opposed. A 10-day reporting trip across Wisconsin and Michigan found local opposition driven by a mix of concerns: energy costs, land use, water quality, and attachment to place, rather than abstract fears about AI. In Janesville, Wisconsin, a proposed data center on a contaminated 250-acre former GM site drew fierce community resistance despite the developer offering $30 million in cleanup costs and $4.8 million in annual tax revenue. Activists successfully blocked the deal and secured a ballot referendum requiring voter approval for future developments exceeding $450 million. The backlash reflects a broader tension between the physical infrastructure demands of AI scaling and the communities expected to host it.
Don't miss tomorrow's
The Daily Pulse in your inbox each morning — sourced and linked.