Is Paying Artists Enough to Convince Them to Embrace AI?
Paying artists for training data may reshape AI ethics debates—but won't automatically win creator buy-in.
Illustrators have spent years sounding the alarm about generative artificial intelligence startups training their models on artists' work without permission. They've pointed out how the practice is tantamount to theft, and in response, many gen AI boosters have argued that it's necessary for the technology's evolution. This has led to contentious legal battles , but it's also given rise to a new wave of AI startups like Pippa that market their services as being more ethical than the competition. Like most companies selling access to text-to-video models, Pippa's main product is short bursts of user-generated footage that can be cobbled toget … Read the full story at The Verge.
- 01Illustrators have spent years sounding the alarm about generative artificial intelligence startups training their models on artists' work without permission.
- 02They've pointed out how the practice is tantamount to theft, and in response, many gen AI boosters have argued that it's necessary for the technology's evolution.
- 03This has led to contentious legal battles , but it's also given rise to a new wave of AI startups like Pippa that market their services as being more ethical than the competition.
- 04Like most companies selling access to text-to-video models, Pippa's main product is short bursts of user-generated footage that can be cobbled toget … Read the full story at The Verge.
Don't miss tomorrow's
The Daily Pulse in your inbox each morning — sourced and linked.