Monday, August 24, 2026

    Integration

    19% of the exam · 8 published objectives

    Domain 3 · Integration

    19%

    Weight as published in the exam guide. Your score report shows a percentage per domain and no domain has its own pass line — only the total scaled score decides the result.

    8 objectives, as published

    The guide lists these as bullets and assigns them no numbers. Nothing here numbers them either, and no score report will.

    • Evaluate tool/agent configuration for capability bloat
    • Analyze authentication and authorization requirements to identify security gaps
    • Evaluate accuracy-latency trade-offs and justify configuration decisions
    • Analyze observability challenges and select monitoring strategies at scale
    • Design a RAG pipeline with appropriate chunking and indexing strategies
    • Apply retrieval strategies matched to data shape and query pattern
    • Evaluate connection protocols and select the appropriate integration mechanism (MCP, API/CLI, agent-to-agent)
    • Evaluate progressive discovery vs. monolithic context strategy

    5 concepts — tap a card for the example, the right instinct and the trap

    Objectives in this domain Anthropic does not document

    • RAG and retrieval architecture — no Anthropic guide exists
      How we know: Searched the whole platform.claude.com path manifest for /rag|retrieval/ on 2026-08-24: zero hits. The nearest page, Embeddings, is largely a third-party vendor table linking out to Voyage's own material.
      Read instead: The only first-party worked examples are the RAG recipes in the capabilities/ directory of the Claude Cookbooks repository. Citations and structured outputs cover the grounding half; chunking and indexing strategy is not documented by Anthropic at all.
      Objectives this leaves unsupported
      • Design a RAG pipeline with appropriate chunking and indexing strategies
      • Apply retrieval strategies matched to data shape and query pattern
    • Observability — one page, and it is on the Claude Code host
      How we know: Observability with OpenTelemetry, under the Agent SDK, is the only observability page in the corpus. There is no platform-level equivalent, and the exam asks about monitoring strategies at scale.
      Read instead: That page for the mechanism, plus the Usage & Cost and Analytics APIs for what is measurable about a deployment. Nothing first-party discusses observability design for a multi-agent system.
      Objectives this leaves unsupported
      • Analyze observability challenges and select monitoring strategies at scale
      • Monitor system performance using logging and observability tools

    Working the whole blueprint? The study guide carries the eligibility gate, the exam logistics and every concept card in one place.