Domain 3 · Integration
19%Weight as published in the exam guide. Your score report shows a percentage per domain and no domain has its own pass line — only the total scaled score decides the result.
8 objectives, as published
The guide lists these as bullets and assigns them no numbers. Nothing here numbers them either, and no score report will.
- Evaluate tool/agent configuration for capability bloat
- Analyze authentication and authorization requirements to identify security gaps
- Evaluate accuracy-latency trade-offs and justify configuration decisions
- Analyze observability challenges and select monitoring strategies at scale
- Design a RAG pipeline with appropriate chunking and indexing strategies
- Apply retrieval strategies matched to data shape and query pattern
- Evaluate connection protocols and select the appropriate integration mechanism (MCP, API/CLI, agent-to-agent)
- Evaluate progressive discovery vs. monolithic context strategy
5 concepts — tap a card for the example, the right instinct and the trap
Verified first-party sources for this domain
18 pages, each fetched and observed to resolve on 2026-08-24.
Objectives in this domain Anthropic does not document
- RAG and retrieval architecture — no Anthropic guide existsHow we know: Searched the whole platform.claude.com path manifest for /rag|retrieval/ on 2026-08-24: zero hits. The nearest page, Embeddings, is largely a third-party vendor table linking out to Voyage's own material.Read instead: The only first-party worked examples are the RAG recipes in the capabilities/ directory of the Claude Cookbooks repository. Citations and structured outputs cover the grounding half; chunking and indexing strategy is not documented by Anthropic at all.Objectives this leaves unsupported
- Design a RAG pipeline with appropriate chunking and indexing strategies
- Apply retrieval strategies matched to data shape and query pattern
- Observability — one page, and it is on the Claude Code hostHow we know: Observability with OpenTelemetry, under the Agent SDK, is the only observability page in the corpus. There is no platform-level equivalent, and the exam asks about monitoring strategies at scale.Read instead: That page for the mechanism, plus the Usage & Cost and Analytics APIs for what is measurable about a deployment. Nothing first-party discusses observability design for a multi-agent system.Objectives this leaves unsupported
- Analyze observability challenges and select monitoring strategies at scale
- Monitor system performance using logging and observability tools
Working the whole blueprint? The study guide carries the eligibility gate, the exam logistics and every concept card in one place.