Account Reconciliation Triage
Auto-match the clean reconciliations and route only the genuine breaks to humans.
Rules clear the exact matches and a trained model scores the rest, so high-confidence reconciliations clear straight through. A language model drafts the note for each remaining break, and preparers spend their time on exceptions instead of ticking and tying lines that already agree.
LLM workflow (rung 4 of 6). A coded control path: chain, router, parallel fan-out, evaluator-optimizer.
Not an agent: the sequence of steps is fixed in advance, so the whole path can be tested end to end.
A language model handles step 4. Rules: step 1 · Predictive ML: steps 2 and 3 · Human: step 5.
- Autonomy: T2 · Act on exception
- Acts unattended on the confident majority; routes the rest to a human. Human role: reviews only the routed cases.
- How it is governed
- The path is testable end to end. Each step is independently evaluable.
- Anthropic (Claude Certified Architect – Foundations (CCAR-F))Workflow: models and tools on predefined code paths (chaining, routing, parallelization, evaluator-optimizer). source
- OpenAI (OpenAI agent guidance (Agents SDK, Codex, OpenAI Academy))Orchestrating via code, which the Agents SDK calls more deterministic and predictable. source
- Google Cloud (Generative AI Leader)Workflow agents (sequential, parallel, loop) that run steps in a fixed order. source
- Microsoft (AI-901 (Azure AI Fundamentals) and AB-100 (Agentic AI Business Solutions Architect))Sequential and concurrent orchestration patterns, with steps in a set order. source
How Koko classifies AI · the full ladder is taught in AI & Agentic Delivery Foundations.
Try it
Illustrative demoWorked example of "Account Reconciliation Triage" on synthetic data — edit the inputs to tailor it. Edit the inputs to tailor the output — it's baked synthetic data, so nothing leaves your browser until you run it live.
Synthetic demo company (a ~$5B high-growth US AI SaaS) — swap in any name to tailor the output.
What this run should concentrate on.
Workflow
- 1.RulesIngest sub-ledger and bank/GL balances for the accounts in scope.
- 2.Predictive MLClear exact matches by rule, score the remaining candidate pairs, and auto-clear those above the approved confidence threshold.
- 3.Predictive MLCluster the unmatched items into break types (timing, missing, duplicate, FX).
- 4.Generative AIDraft a proposed disposition and supporting note for each break.
- 5.HumanQueue exceptions for preparer action; lock auto-cleared items for reviewer sampling.
Prompt recipe
Match the attached sub-ledger lines to the GL/bank lines. Auto-clear pairs with match confidence ≥ [95%]. For everything unmatched, classify the break (timing / missing / duplicate / FX / other), propose a disposition, and explain your reasoning. Never auto-clear below the confidence threshold.
- Auto-match confidence threshold approved and monitored
- Reviewer samples a percentage of auto-cleared items
- Segregation of duties preserved (preparer ≠ reviewer)
- Full audit trail of match decisions retained